MSTR Quote, Financials, Valuation and Earnings

Microsoft has a net margin of -555.78% compared to Strategy's net margin of 34.62%. Strategy's return on equity of -19.84% beat Microsoft's return on equity of 34.34%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $513.01, signalling upside risk potential of 74.33%. On the other hand Microsoft has an analysts' consensus of $505.94 which suggests that it could grow by 30.16%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Microsoft, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Microsoft.

Strategy has a beta of 3.359, which suggesting that the stock is 235.909% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Microsoft has a beta of 0.918, suggesting its less volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.215%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Microsoft offers a yield of 0.81% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.83 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft pays out 24.7% of its earnings as a dividend. Microsoft's payout ratio is sufficient to cover dividend payouts with earnings for the foreseeable future.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $120.7M, which are smaller than Microsoft quarterly revenues of $69.6B. Strategy's net income of -$670.8M is lower than Microsoft's net income of $24.1B. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Microsoft's PE ratio is 31.30x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 122.22x versus 11.09x for Microsoft. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Cloudflare has a net margin of -555.78% compared to Strategy's net margin of -2.79%. Strategy's return on equity of -19.84% beat Cloudflare's return on equity of -8.83%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $513.01, signalling upside risk potential of 74.33%. On the other hand Cloudflare has an analysts' consensus of $138.78 which suggests that it could grow by 19.62%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Cloudflare, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Cloudflare.

Strategy has a beta of 3.359, which suggesting that the stock is 235.909% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Cloudflare has a beta of 1.273, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 27.342%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Cloudflare offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Cloudflare pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $120.7M, which are smaller than Cloudflare quarterly revenues of $459.9M. Strategy's net income of -$670.8M is lower than Cloudflare's net income of -$12.8M. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Cloudflare's PE ratio is --. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 122.22x versus 23.72x for Cloudflare. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Okta has a net margin of -555.78% compared to Strategy's net margin of 3.37%. Strategy's return on equity of -19.84% beat Okta's return on equity of 0.46%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $513.01, signalling upside risk potential of 74.33%. On the other hand Okta has an analysts' consensus of $116.68 which suggests that it could grow by 0.46%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Okta, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Okta.

Strategy has a beta of 3.359, which suggesting that the stock is 235.909% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Okta has a beta of 1.090, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 8.984%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Okta offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Okta pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $120.7M, which are smaller than Okta quarterly revenues of $682M. Strategy's net income of -$670.8M is lower than Okta's net income of $23M. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Okta's PE ratio is 2,891.00x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 122.22x versus 7.79x for Okta. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.

Uber Technologies has a net margin of -555.78% compared to Strategy's net margin of 57.56%. Strategy's return on equity of -19.84% beat Uber Technologies's return on equity of 63.2%.

Strategy has a consensus price target of $513.01, signalling upside risk potential of 74.33%. On the other hand Uber Technologies has an analysts' consensus of $89.10 which suggests that it could grow by 22.51%. Given that Strategy has higher upside potential than Uber Technologies, analysts believe Strategy is more attractive than Uber Technologies.

Strategy has a beta of 3.359, which suggesting that the stock is 235.909% more volatile than S&P 500. In comparison Uber Technologies has a beta of 1.391, suggesting its more volatile than the S&P 500 by 39.134%.

Strategy has a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share corresponding to a yield of 0%. Uber Technologies offers a yield of 0% to investors and pays a quarterly dividend of $0.00 per share. Strategy pays -- of its earnings as a dividend. Uber Technologies pays out -- of its earnings as a dividend.

Strategy quarterly revenues are $120.7M, which are smaller than Uber Technologies quarterly revenues of $12B. Strategy's net income of -$670.8M is lower than Uber Technologies's net income of $6.9B. Notably, Strategy's price-to-earnings ratio is -- while Uber Technologies's PE ratio is 15.95x. Generally a lower price-to-earnings ratio signals a stock is trading at a lower multiple of earnings and is a better value. Another key metric is the price-to-sales ratio, which for Strategy is 122.22x versus 3.53x for Uber Technologies. Usually stocks with elevated PS ratios are considered overvalued.